For hunters, having the right footwear is one of their most important hunting preparations. If your feet are wet, cold, and blistered, then your hunting trip will not only be miserable, but you won’t be hunting at the top of your game.
That’s why in this article we’ll be comparing these top brands to help you get the right boot for hunting, fishing, or even just handling farm chores!
Let’s start out with a quick comparison of temp ratings, comfort, and durability!
Muck vs Bogs vs Lacrosse
|Lifespan||3-4 Years||2-3 Years||5-6 Years|
|Price||Good Value||Most Affordable||Most Expensive|
|Temp Rating||Up To -60||Up To -40||Up To -70|
|Terrain||Great Ice Traction||Best On Flat Ground||Rough Terrain|
|Check Price On Amazon||Check Price On Amazon||Check Price On Amazon|
The Bogs boot is a good all around chore boot, but the Muck boot offers exceptional ice traction. It’s the preferred boot for most ice fishermen for a reason, and if you’d like a boot which can get you through tough winters, it’s definitely the way to go. Muck offers temperature ratings up to -60 if you need it as well, while Bogs tops out at around -40.
BUT, if you need a rubber boot for hunting the Lacrosse Alpha Burly is our top pick! This boot comes in many different insulation levels (up to -70 1600g insulation rating!), which will keep you plenty warm on winter treks through the woods. However, it also offers the best comfort and durability out of all of the products we’ve researched, and hunters recommend it more than any other rubber boot!
Lacrosse offers a tighter fit than both the Muck and the Bogs boots, which make them a great choice for climbing tree stands, or navigating uneven terrain, while the Muck and Bogs boots are better for navigating flat ground.
As for the Bogs, they’re a good choice if you need an all-purpose chore or winter weather boot and you don’t want to spend a lot. But, they are lacking in durability compared to the other two, and their cold rating is about half that of the top Lacrosse and Muck models. In short, Lacrosse is better for bad terrain, Muck is better for ice and upland, and the Bogs are best for farm chores or more casual wear.
Interested in learning more about these boots? Keep reading for the full overview of each one!
Lacrosse Boots Overview, Features, and Specs
We’ve spent a lot of time researching the brands featured in this article, and the Lacrosse Alphaburly was the most recommended boot by hunters surveyed. There are a lot of reasons for this, but we feel that the number one reason for them choosing this boot is mobility, something that our other options seem to be lacking.
While the Muck boots are often clunky and rigid, the Lacrosse boots are streamlined and lightweight. They’re easy to maneuver in, and they perform much better for tasks like climbing up tree stands and for navigating sketchy terrain.
For the Lacrosse vs Muck Boots debate, Lacrosse definitely has a serious advantage in this department.
Their form fitting construction offers a heel that cups your foot and a more flexible in-step as well. This makes them much more comfortable for long treks to your preferred hunting ground when compared to Muck boots or Bogs, because your feet won’t be sliding around in them, chaffing and blistering your heels.
We also really like the fact that the Alphaburly has adjustable gusset straps on the back so that you can easily customize your fit. However, that point seems to be debatable, and other hunters are not fans of this strap system. (You can also get a half-zip version that’s easier to get one your foot.)
These boots also have much better tread in our opinion when compared to the other boots, as you can see in the photo below, making them better for rocky terrain. Bad tread can mean a twisted ankle or broken leg in the back country, miles from civilization, and that means it should be a top concern when shopping for a good pair of boots.
The second most likely reason that so many hunters prefer this boot is durability. Many hunters complain that their Muck boots and Bogs can be easily torn on brush and terrain, an almost guaranteed scenario for hunting out in the bush. However, the Alphaburly seems to do much better in these conditions, with some hunters keeping their boots for 5-8 seasons, a great lifespan for a rubber boot, which are known for not being as hardy as leather hunting boots.
These boots also have an interestingly patterned neoprene liner, which greatly helps with breath-ability, another thing that the other two boots are lacking.
This helps you to keep from getting sweaty, which will then not only make you cold but will also create scent. Scents alert deer and other game to your presence and spooks them, leaving your favorite hunting grounds a ghost town.
If you go with the Alphaburly boot, we’d recommend pairing it with a good quality Merino wool sock. These socks are amazingly warm, keeping your feet toasty in harsh conditions, but they also don’t allow sweat or odor to build up in your shoes. This greatly helps to control scent issues, making them a very worthwhile purchase.
If you hunt in some seriously harsh terrain, you’ll also be interested to know that Lacrosse boots have the lowest temperature rating of all three boots in this review, offering a 1600g model that’s good to go at -70! Though the Mucks are no slouch, and their top models are rated at -60, so if you really do want the Mucks, this isn’t much of a deciding factor. (Though the Bogs cap out at around -40, which isn’t the best.)
Honestly, the only negative points for this boot are the price and the fact that it can be very ill fitting for those with wider feet due to its form-fitting nature. So, if you’ve got a wide foot bed, then you might need to go with the Muck boots here. The Mucks definitely have their merits, and they are a specialist in their own right! Which brings us to our next section.
Muck Boots Overview, Features, and Specs
So, we’ve established that the Lacrosse boots are our top pick, but that’s not the whole story! The truth is, the right boot for you will depend on your personal usage, the situation, and your sizing. So, let’s talk about the Muck boots now and who they might be a good fit for.
While some people dislike one boot or another, the main reason is comfort and their foot size. For people with wider feet, the Muck boot is often the most comfortable option for them. While these boots are a little clunkier and less flexible, they offer comfort for people with larger feet that either can’t get into tighter fitting boots or have trouble getting them off!
Conversely, if you have a high in-step, then you may either have trouble getting Mucks on your feet, or find that there is too much room around the foot! This can cause that infuriating “sliding” that causes blisters and ruins your insulation. Still, some people swear that Mucks are the best upland hunting and utility boots that they’ve ever owned.
The Mucks are also almost universally preferred by every sportsmen in one category: ice fishing. That’s because these boots have exceptional traction on ice, making it the top choice for this sport. While we prefer the Lacrosse’s traction for climbing and iffy terrain, if that’s not your focus, then the Mucks will do you just fine on flat land, and they’ll perform exceptionally well walking over ice. So, be sure to take that into consideration when making a purchase.
As for durability, the Mucks tend to not hold up quite as well as the Lacrosse boots, and you may need to replace them a little sooner. Most people expect to get 3-4 seasons out of their Mucks before requiring a replacement, which isn’t bad. That’s just the nature of rubber boots, unfortunately.
The good news is, the Mucks are a bit cheaper than the Lacrosse boots to make up for this shorter lifespan, and if you’re careful with them, then you’ll still get a lot of wear out of them before they give in. Just be wary of brush, because sharp branches can easily tear the boot outer, ruining your weatherproofing.
All in all, these boots are a pretty good compromise between quality and price. So, if you’re just looking for an affordable yet dependable boot for hunting in bad weather, on relatively flat or icy terrain, then we’d recommend picking up a pair of these, especially if you have wider feet.
The Mucks are an excellent boot for the price, and while we love the features of the Lacrosse boot, the Muck is no slouch. The Arctic Pro and Woody Max models are still fantastic boots and will get the job done for you in the field hunting, fishing, or working on your property.
Bogs Boots Features, Overview, and Specs
Okay, so that brings us to our last entry: the Bogs. Truth be told, the Bogs are a more casual boot, and if you’re looking for a serious hunting boot then we’d still recommend the other two choices in the article, but there is a potential market here in the middle ground.
For starters, the Bogs are generally the cheapest option on the list. They can be a great choice if you’re looking for a cheap, yet effective, Muck boot alternative which will keep your feet dry for occasional flat land hunting and maybe some yard or farm chores.
Some people prefer the fit of the Bogs too, which seems to be a mixture of our other two options. They are lighter than Muck boots, but they don’t seem to be as clunky, with some hunters claiming they’re as good as tennis shoes for chasing down hogs.
Bogs also seems to have a nicer variety of footwear if you’re looking for something cheap that can pull double duty as a bad weather boot, chore boot, or work shoe. The bad news is that their “hunter” specific boots seem to be pretty pricey. However, there are a lot of other suitable models in their work boot category which are cheaper and will likely serve you just as well.
As far as durability goes, they hold up pretty well, and you can expect to get a few seasons out of them. However, this will depend on how hard you go on them, and if you’re not careful around brush or other sharp objects, then it’s easy to tear them up quickly, so be mindful. While they aren’t quite as high-quality as Mucks are, the price is right, and they’re definitely worth considering.
However, the biggest problem with a cheaper boot like the Bogs is that they lack a lot of the “invisible” extras of pricier boots. This includes things like thicker soles and foam foot padding which adds a lot of comfort.
This is obviously not a big concern if you’re just walking around town, but if you plan to spend all day hiking and hunting in the backwoods in these boots, then we’d recommend something like the Lacrosse instead.
Some people even complain that they can feel the ground through these boots, and that’s bad news for your poor feet when traversing rough terrain, or hunting in extreme temperatures. The breath-ability of Bogs is also not great, and that can cause issues with sweating, blisters, and sliding around in them, especially if the fit is not on point.
However, we do have to give Bogs big props in one area: customer service. While some hunters have reported issues with getting replacements for defective Mucks, Bogs is on top of things. One hunter reports that Bogs immediately mailed out a replacement pair after his boots developed a crack after only 2 months of use, but Mucks was not nearly as helpful for the same issue. So, that’s definitely something to think about.
In closing, any of these boots could be considered a good boot based on your situation, and it’s important that you make your choice based on your needs. We’ve done our best to provide the information which we think is most valuable, but only you know the details of your situation, obviously.
Tip: We recommended looking on Amazon for these boots, no matter which one you pick. For starters, they almost always offer the best price due to their price matching algorithm, even beating the manufacturer! BUT, they also allow you to easily return boots that don’t fit right. A good fit is important for your boots, and you want a retailer that will let you exchange them if your first pick is a dud.
PS. We’ve just done a new article on Dryshod vs Muck if you’re interested in seeing how this brand stacks up against them as well!